Welcome
Welcome to the Santa Cruz Volleyball Forum!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you access to the discussions.

By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!


Also visit our No Attitudes Allowed Volleyball website.

Third hit; Ball ends up touching offensive player - FAULT ?

Talk about rules of the beach and indoor games

Third hit; Ball ends up touching offensive player - FAULT ?

Postby jimmcnamee on Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:55 am

Hi.....This came up the other day & wondered the rule:

A player hit a lob over (3rd hit) and then his movement carried him under the net (without contacting the net) and the ball hit his foot....The defense took the point, though I didn't think they had a play on the ball. Was that play over when the ball hit the offensive player's foot, regardless of that being interference on the defense?
jimmcnamee
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 8:41 am

Re: Third hit; Ball ends up touching offensive player - FAULT ?

Postby Crawfish on Fri Jun 05, 2009 5:23 pm

Jim,

According to the FIVB Official Beach Volleyball Rules:

15.2 PENETRATION INTO THE OPPONENT’S SPACE, COURT AND/OR FREE ZONE
A player may enter into the opponent’s space, court and/or free zone, provided that this does not interfere with the opponent’s play.

Responsibility for this call is by:

26 SECOND REFEREE [If there is one...my comment]
26.3 RESPONSIBILITIES
26.3.1 During the match, the second referee decides, whistles and signals:
b) interference due to penetration into the opponent’s court and space under the net (Rule
15.2)

So I would take this to mean it's a judgment call as to whether the opponents COULD have played the ball. If there's a referee, it's his or her call. If it's a pick-up game, take the opponent's word for it and move on to the next point.

After sustaining many ankle injuries from players crossing under the net indoors, if I see someone that looks like he or she is out of control and probably will cross under the net, I stay put. In that case, it might appear that I wasn't going to make a play on the ball when I was in fact making a conscious decision not to risk injury.

If both opponents were completely faked out of their sand socks and frozen facing another direction...I don't think anyone could call interference with a straight face.

Tom
Crawfish
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:59 pm


Return to What's the Call?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests